I still think he could have made a better moive with Rajni. Infact I think all that Shankar did was show Rajni in different get ups.. I still think he made poor use of Rajni's acting skills be it serious or comedy.
He probably tried to do a Houdini.. filling up the screen with so many colours and special effects and Rajni in the frame all time so that ppl r misdirected and do not notice the drawbacks of the film.
I would definitely not agree if you tell me Shankar had to compramise a bit for Rajni in terms of story.. why tryto convey a messsage.. he could have tried something new.. a thriller or a comedy movie for instance.
8 comments:
ada ada. alcohol induced enlighntenment dhane?
Annaaaaaaaaa...
chumma thattuvam alli veesareenga..
chumma adhurudhulla
adengappa enna thattuvam..
Pudhu Kadavulukku Saga kadavul ezhudhuvadha...
sHIvam oda Shivaji ya kalakkada...
btw Shivaji.. worstu padam sumar dhan.. Shankar aracha maave ye arikkaran.. movie would have been much better had he cut short the length..
Shankar has definitely lost his track.. probalby has no new ideas.
vishy,
If not for Rajni, I would agree with your statement. It was not Sankar's movie. It was Rajni's movie directed by Sankar.
I still think he could have made a better moive with Rajni. Infact I think all that Shankar did was show Rajni in different get ups..
I still think he made poor use of Rajni's acting skills be it serious or comedy.
He probably tried to do a Houdini.. filling up the screen with so many colours and special effects and Rajni in the frame all time so that ppl r misdirected and do not notice the drawbacks of the film.
I would definitely not agree if you tell me Shankar had to compramise a bit for Rajni in terms of story.. why tryto convey a messsage.. he could have tried something new.. a thriller or a comedy movie for instance.
Isnt that an awesome movie? Lesser mortals never appreciated that one.
deepa,
u mean planes,trains and automobiles?
Post a Comment